ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: In CML-CP, the BCR::ABL1 T315I mutation confers resistance to previously approved ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), except ponatinib and olverembatinib. In a previous analysis of the phase I, dose-escalation trial X2101, asciminib-a BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that binds to the ABL myristoyl pocket-demonstrated efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with T315I-mutated CML. We report updated efficacy and safety data in patients with CML-CP with the T315I mutation (data cutoff: January 6, 2021). OBJECTIVE: Provide updated safety and efficacy data for patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP after added exposure. DESIGN: Patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP and treated with >=1 prior TKI were enrolled and received asciminib 200mg twice daily (BID). RESULTS: 48 patients were included;25 patients (52.1%) received >=3 prior TKIs. At data cutoff, treatment was ongoing in 27 patients (56.3%). 45 of 48 patients were evaluable (BCR::ABL1IS >0.1% at baseline) for major molecular response (MMR);3 were excluded for BCR::ABL1 atypical transcripts. Among evaluable patients, 19 (42.2%) achieved MMR by week 24 and 22 (48.9%) by week 96. Evaluable patients included 26 ponatinib-pretreated and 19 ponatinib-naive patients;34.6% and 68.4%, respectively, achieved MMR by week 96. The probability of maintaining MMR for >=96 weeks was 84% (95% CI, 68.1%-100.0%). 23 of 37 patients (62.2%) with BCR::ABL1IS >1% at baseline achieved BCR::ABL1IS <=1% by week 96. The safety/tolerability profile of asciminib remained favorable after =9 months of added exposure (median duration of exposure, 2.08 years;range, 0.04-4.13 years). The most common (>=10%) grade >=3 adverse events (AEs) were lipase increase (18.8%, all asymptomatic elevations) and thrombocytopenia (14.6%). Arterial occlusive events occurred in 4 patients (8.3%);none led to dose adjustment/interruption/discontinuation. AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 5 patients (10.4%). Only 2 study deaths, both due to COVID-19, occurred in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: After a median exposure of >2 years, asciminib monotherapy 200mg BID exhibited a sustained, favorable safety profile and clinical efficacy in patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP-a population with high unmet medical need. This updated analysis confirms asciminib as a treatment option for patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP, including those previously treated with ponatinib.
ABSTRACT
Background: In pts with CML, the BCR::ABL1 T315I mutation is associated with poor clinical outcomes and confers resistance to previously approved ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Until recently, ponatinib (PON) was the only TKI available for these pts, but its use may be limited by associated cardiovascular events. In the primary analysis of the phase I trial X2101, asciminib-the 1st BCR::ABL1 inhibitor to Specifically Target the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP)-demonstrated efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated pts with CML with T315I. These results supported the FDA approval of asciminib as a new treatment option for pts with CML-CP with T315I (NCCN 2021). We report updated efficacy and safety data in these pts (data cutoff: January 6, 2021). Aims: Provide updated safety and efficacy data for pts with CML-CP with T315I treated with asciminib monotherapy 200 mg twice daily (BID) after added exposure. Methods: Pts with CML-CP with T315I were enrolled if treated with ≥1 prior TKI and no other effective therapy was available, provided informed consent, and received asciminib 200 mg BID. Results: 48 pts with T315I were included;2 (4.2%) pts had additional BCR::ABL1 mutations at baseline. Eight (16.7%), 15 (31.3%) and 25 (52.1%) pts received 1,2, and ≥3 prior TKIs, respectively. At data cutoff, treatment was ongoing in more than half (27 [56.3%]) of pts;the predominant reason for treatment discontinuation was physician's decision (11 [22.9%]), mainly due to lack of efficacy. Of the 48 pts, 45 were evaluable (BCR::ABL1IS >0.1% at baseline) for major molecular response (MMR);3 were excluded for BCR::ABL1 atypical transcripts. Among evaluable pts, 19 (42.2%) achieved MMR by wk 24 and 22 (48.9%) by wk 96;19 were still in MMR at the cutoff date. Evaluable pts included 26 PON-pretreated and 19 PONnaive pts;34.6% and 68.4%, respectively, achieved MMR by the cutoff date (Table). The probability of pts maintaining MMR for ≥96 wks was 84% (95% CI, 68.1-100.0). Thirteen (28.9%) and 11 (24.4%) pts achieved MR4 and MR4.5, respectively. Twenty (54.1%) and 23 (62.2%) of 37 pts with BCR::ABL1IS >1% at baseline achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% by wk 48 and 96, respectively. The median duration of exposure was 2.08 (range, 0.04-4.13) yrs with more than half (27 [56.3%]) of pts receiving treatment for ≥96 wks;the median daily dose intensity was 398.3 (range, 179-400) mg/day. The safety/tolerability profile of asciminib remained favorable after ≈9 months of added follow-up (Table). The most common (≥5%) grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were lipase increase (18.8%, all asymptomatic elevations), thrombocytopenia (14.6%), and vomiting, ALT increase, abdominal pain, hypertension, anemia, neutropenia, and neutrophil count decrease (6.3% each). Arterial occlusive events occurred in 4 (8.3%) pts;none led to dose adjustment/interruption/discontinuation. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 2 new pts since the previous data cutoff;both pts discontinued and died due to COVID-19. These were the only study deaths reported in this pt population. Image: Summary/Conclusion: Asciminib monotherapy 200 mg BID exhibited a sustained, favorable safety profile after added exposure with no new safety signals in pts with CML-CP with T315I-a population with high unmet medical need. The clinical efficacy of asciminib is demonstrated by the high proportion of pts achieving durable MMR and BCR::ABL1IS ≤ 1%. The updated analysis confirms asciminib as a treatment option for pts with CML-CP with T315I, including those for whom treatment with PON has failed.
ABSTRACT
Recent clinical observations that some coronavirus infections induced complete remissions in lymphoma patients emphasized again the potential of cancer virotherapy. Infection of cancer cells with oncolytic viruses reshapes the tumor microenvironment by activating anti-viral and anti-tumor immunity. A phase 1 clinical trial using oncolytic adenovirus Delta-24-RGD (DNX-2401) to treat recurrent malignant gliomas demonstrated activation of CD8+ T-cells and significant clinical benefits for a subset of patients. However, both anti-virus and anti-tumor immune responses are contingent on the activation of respective clones of CD8+ T-cells, which compete for clonal expansion. Thus, overexpansion of T-cells against viral antigens reduces the frequency of subdominant clones against tumor antigens. We hypothesized that inducing immune tolerance for viral antigens will decrease anti-viral immunity and in turn derepress anti-tumor immunity, resulting in enhanced efficacy of cancer virotherapy. In this work, we used nanoparticles encapsulating adenoviral antigens E1A, E1B and hexon that distributed to liver resident macrophages (P<0.0001) and induced peripheral immune tolerance. Functional experiments to restimulate immune cells with viral or tumor antigens showed that injection of nanoparticles induced virus-specific immune tolerance and redirected the focus of the immune response towards tumor peptides as measured by interferon-gamma secretion (P<0.0001). Co-culture experiments also showed increased activation of immune cells against fixed tumor cells after nanoparticle treatment (P<0.0001). Reduction of virus-specific T-cells and concurrent expansion of tumor-specific T-cell clones were further confirmed with E1A or OVA tetramers (P<0.05). Flow cytometry analysis suggested increased anti-tumor responses were due to differences in T-cell clones and not due to other immune populations including natural killer cells or myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P=0.3). Importantly, virotherapy in combination with nanoparticle-induced immune tolerance towards viral antigens in tumor-bearing mice increased the overall survival and doubled the percentage of long-term survivors compared to virus treatment alone. Our data should propel the development of a future clinical trial aiming to maximize the potential of anti-tumor immunity during cancer virotherapies.
ABSTRACT
Background: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a myeloid cell growth factor and pro-inflammatory cytokine, may drive the overactive host immune response in COVID-19. We conducted a clinical trial assessing the anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody gimsilumab for hyperinflammatory COVID-19 pneumonia (BREATHE). Here, we report a pre-specified subgroup analysis demonstrating a signal of benefit in patients invasively ventilated at baseline. Methods: BREATHE (NCT04351243) was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at 21 US locations. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive two doses of IV gimsilumab or placebo one week apart. The study included hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammation (CRP ≥50 mg/L or ferritin ≥1,000 ng/mL) and pre-ARDS lung injury or ARDS. The primary endpoint was all cause mortality at day 43, and key secondary outcomes assessed ventilator use and hospitalization length. Results: 225 patients were randomized and dosed. 41 patients were invasively ventilated at baseline. Steroid use and baseline characteristics were generally balanced across study arms in this subgroup. Ventilated patients treated with gimsilumab demonstrated improvements over placebo on the primary and key secondary endpoints (Table 1). Contrasting the placebo group, gimsilumabtreated patients did not experience a sharp rise in NT-proBNP, a marker of heart failure, through day 43 (Figure 1). Conclusions: GM-CSF inhibition may be therapeutic in ventilated COVID-19 patients through a neurohormonal mechanism. More studies are needed to assess the role of GM-CSF in COVID-19-associated cardiomyopathy, volume status, and ARDS.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The corona crisis not only affects professional activities but also teaching and learning at universities. Buzzwords, such as elearning and digitalization suggest the possibility of innovative teaching approaches that are readily available to solve the problems of teaching in the current COVID-19 pandemic. The current conversion to digital teaching is not primarily driven by didactic rationale or institutional strategy but by external circumstances. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the teaching situation at national university ENT clinics and academic teaching hospitals at the start of the virtual corona summer semester in 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A specifically self-designed questionnaire regarding the local situation and conditions as well as nationwide scenarios was sent to all 39 national university ENT clinics and 20 ENT departments at academic teaching hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 31 university hospitals and 10 academic teaching hospitals took part in the survey. There were obvious discrepancies between available resources and effectively available digital teaching and learning contents. Further criticism was expressed regarding the communication with the medical faculty, the digital infrastructure and particularly the frequent lack of collaboration with central support facilities, such as media, didactics and datacenters. CONCLUSION: There are positive examples of successful transformation of classroom teaching to an exclusively virtual summer semester 2020 within the university ENT clinics; however, critical ratings of assistant professors and medical directors regarding the current teaching situation predominated. A time-critical strategic advancement is urgently needed.